Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBo Zhang
dc.creatorEllinas, Elizabeth Hollenback
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T23:38:32Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T23:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/92757
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the factor structure of two common perfectionism scales – the Almost Perfect Scale – Revised (APS-R) and the Short Almost Perfect Scale (SAPS) - in medical students. It was found that both two-factor models hold for them, albeit marginally for the APS-R. Measurement invariance by gender showed that while configural invariance and metric invariance hold, scalar invariance does not, indicating that the means for men and women may not be meaningfully compared by using these scales. Additionally, several items exhibited differential item functioning, most of which are in the Discrepancy scale of the APS-R. Overall, the SAPS provides better fit with fewer biased items, and therefore is likely to be a better instrument for comparing perfectionism in men and women medical students, although direct comparison of group means should still be exercised with caution.
dc.relation.replaceshttps://dc.uwm.edu/etd/2779
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectMedical Students
dc.subjectPerfectionism
dc.subjectWomen
dc.titleThe Almost Perfect Scale in Medical Students: Model Confirmation, Measurement Invariance, and Differential Item Functioning By Gender
dc.typethesis
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Psychology
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
dc.contributor.committeememberRazia Azen
dc.contributor.committeememberTavinder Ark
dc.contributor.committeememberJessica Olson


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record