Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHua, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorRicci, Kyra
dc.contributor.authorLu, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorShidemantle, Grascen
dc.contributor.authorHua, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T17:42:58Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T17:42:58Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/85061
dc.description.abstractEngaging youth in early and sustained conservation education has important implications for promoting positive attitudes and behaviors in those who will become the future of conservation and management. Towards this goal, visual narratives (comic books, graphic novels) are an increasingly popular method used by conservation scientists to educate young people due to their approachable use of art and narrative storytelling. However, no studies have directly assessed how visual narratives compare to with more traditional forms of conservation education for youth. In this study, wWe asked, how does education about biodiversity through visual narrative affect student perceptions and knowledge of science content relative to a traditional resource, and is there a novelty effect when using visual narrative versus. traditional resources? To assess our questions, we utilized a semistructured approach to developdeveloped a biodiversity education program using with (SSG, using) a semi- structured approach. Specifically, we developed an original graphic novel (visual narrative treatment), and a slideshow presentation (traditional treatment) with the same content to educate children about wetland biodiversity. We recruited, trained, and randomized 26 third grade teachers to deliver either the visual narrative or traditional resource in their classrooms. Students completed pretest, posttest, and follow-up surveys assessing their perceptions of science and knowledge of the lesson content. We found that sStudents in the visual narrative treatment held more positive perceptions of science (by 3.79%, p = 0.001), while whereas students in the traditional treatment performed better on content quizzes (by 7.97%, p = 0.002). Additionally, wWe find found (SSG, tense) evidence for a novelty bias when using the visual narrative but not the traditional resource. These findings point toward the importance of understanding the target audience and clearly defining educational goals. Overall, this study our results contributes to broader our understanding of the relative benefits and limitations of conservation education through non-traditional means as well as and of practices for successfully delivering effective, accessible, and rewarding conservation education to educators and youth.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF Graduate Research Fellowship No. DGE-1747503, NSF award No. 2314625en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectvisual arten_US
dc.subjectvisual narrativeen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental educationen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental communicationen_US
dc.subjectscience educationen_US
dc.subjectscience arten_US
dc.subjectenvironmental arten_US
dc.subjectamphibiansen_US
dc.subjectconservation biologyen_US
dc.titleVisual narrative vs. traditional slideshow for engaging youth in biodiversity educationen_US
dc.typeDataseten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record