Analysis of the Vegetative Cover of the Brule River Watershed Re-Visited (1852-2016) Phase I
Date
2018-03Author
Hlina, Paul
Feist, Dr. Mary Ann
Schwarting, Reed
Derek, Anderson
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
As early as the 1880’s, the Bois Brule River was known as an outstanding cold water trout stream,
attracting anglers from around the world, including presidents of the United States. By the 1930’s
landowners, visitors, and the Wisconsin Conservation Commission observed a serious decline in the
rivers’ fisheries, which five years (1937-1941) of expenditures did little to improve. In order to
access the causes of this decline and determine how to halt it, a partnership was created through
the Wisconsin Conservation Commission, the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Superior State
Teachers College (now UW-Superior) to begin the largest watershed study of its kind in the state of
Wisconsin. The study brought together scientists and managers from Madison, Brule and Superior to
study the hydrology, geology, topography, vegetation and fisheries of the river and surrounding
landscape to ascertain ecological factors that may be causing declines in fish populations (e.g.
brown trout, brook trout). Dr. Norman Fassett (University of Wisconsin-Madison) a renowned
botanist and Dr. John W. Thomson Jr. (Superior State Teachers College), a young aspiring botany
professor spearheaded the vegetative component of the study from 1942-1944. They produced three of
the ten monographs that were published in the Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Science, art
and Letters (volumes XXXVI and XXXVII) and collectively become known as the Brule River Survey.
The Analysis of the Vegetative Cover of the Brule River Watershed Re-Visited (1852 – 2016)- Phase I
documents vegetation changes that have occurred since the early General Land Office (GLO) – Public
Land Surveys (PLS) in the 1850’s and today. These first surveys set township and section lines by
marking trees (composition, size, distance from corner posts, habitat descriptions, soils, etc.) in
order to “paint a picture” of the resources available for an expanding country and its pioneering
settlers. Within a short period of time (≈20-30 years), Wisconsin no longer had a forest in the
north, but an area termed “the cut-over” region that was sparsely populated. After this intensive
logging period, agriculture was attempted throughout “the cut-over” areas, but in most cases these
ventures failed. This was the backdrop for the next study of the vegetation on the Brule – the
Brule River Survey (Fassett 1944; Thomson 1944-45). At the onset of the study, only remnants of
multi- age and old growth forests existed on private property and most of the remaining landscape
consisted of early successional forest or barrens. Using the PLS data (1852-1856 pre-European
settlement), a vegetative cover map was created in coarse-scale depictions of forested and
non-forested communities. A second vegetative cover map was produced in the 1940’s, applying the
Wisconsin Land Economic Inventory for Douglas and Bayfield County and verified by site visits to
the watershed. Thomson further describes several forested and non-forested plant communities in
terms of species richness, composition and dominance (Thomson 1945).
Thomson vouchered more than 523 specimens representing 312 species from these communities in
duplicate and they are (Appendix A. Pg. A8) deposited at the Wisconsin State Herbarium in Madison
and a second set deposited at the newly created herbarium at the Superior State Teachers College.
Subject
Boreal forests
white cedar swamps
pine barrens
Brule River
vegetation cover
groundcover
shrub
Permanent Link
http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/82881Type
Technical Report

