• Login
    View Item 
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW Madison
    • College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin--Madison
    • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
    • Theses--Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW Madison
    • College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin--Madison
    • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
    • Theses--Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Owner’s Factors on Project Delivery System Choices in the Downstream and Chemicals Sector

    Thumbnail
    File(s)
    MS Thesis (5.459Mb)
    Date
    2021-05
    Author
    Said, Joe
    Advisor(s)
    Hanna, Awad
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Selection of the perfect project delivery system (PDS) for a multi-million downstream and chemical (DCC) sector project is not an easy task and is sometimes overlooked in the project planning phase. Efficiency within this space is crucial and depends on the Owners priorities and goals for the project. Past research has often overlooked the DCC sectors specific market and focused on projects in the entire construction realm; this research aims to align project efficiency with the selection process of delivery systems in this sector. This study aims to analyze the qualitative and quantitative measures resulting from DCC projects and their response to 20 specific Owner’s selection criteria. The project delivery systems within the DCC focus on five areas of expertise: project management, procurement, engineering, construction management, and construction; and have been aggregated into three industry standards of PDSs of: design-bid-build (DBB), engineering-procurement-construction (EPC), and construction management (CM). The results of this study give individual weights to the 20 selection criteria and help an Owner understand which PDS aligns with their specific project goals. Furthermore, paper also gives end-project performance results based on five performance areas: cost, schedule, project scope and complexity, contractor relationship and capabilities, and Owner’s capabilities and preferences.
    Permanent Link
    http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/82222
    Type
    Thesis
    Part of
    • Theses--Civil Engineering

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of MINDS@UWCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback