• Login
    View Item 
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW Madison
    • School of Education, UW-Madison
    • Journal of Advanced Student Science (JASS)
    • 2018
    • View Item
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW Madison
    • School of Education, UW-Madison
    • Journal of Advanced Student Science (JASS)
    • 2018
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effects of Divided Attention on Working and Long-Term Memory

    Thumbnail
    File(s)
    601_5.pdf (699.5Kb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Held, Lucas
    Destree, Marnie
    Philipps, Nicole
    Heinemeyer, Savannah
    Bhathena, Sanaya
    Buttar, Seah
    Publisher
    Journal of Advanced Student Sciences (JASS)
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In today’s classroom, students commonly watch videos, play games, or browse the internet while completing homework or participating in class. With the increasing use of technology in all aspects of our life, research into the effects of multitasking has increased in relevance. We aimed to evaluate whether distractions would impact working and long-term memory and to what extent. We hypothesized that visual and cognitive distraction would decrease the encoding of working memory and subsequent consolidation of long term memory directly and indirectly via inducing stress. Participants were assigned to one of two groups: a control group with no distractions or a treatment group exposed to a distraction. Both groups listened to a list of selected phrases and took a quiz at the end of the recording to evaluate their recognition of those phrases. This was done to assess the effects of distractions on working memory. Participants came back a week after their initial testing to assess their long-term memory with a similar quiz. Heart rate, respiration rate, and electrodermal activity were measured to evaluate stress. Results showed a difference in the week one quiz between the control and treatment group (p-value of 0.0002) and between quiz two of the control vs. treatment (p-value of 0.0002). These results suggest that students who use technology while studying or in class do significantly worse on multiple choice quizzes. All other physiological measures comparing treatment vs. control were not significant (p-value of 0.50, p-value of 0.71, and p-value of 0.36). Future studies can be enhanced by increasing the number of participants and investigating the effects of other sensory distractions on working and long-term memory.
    Subject
    Working memory
    Long-term memory
    Distractions
    EDA
    Heart Rate
    Respirations
    Phrase recognition
    Permanent Link
    http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/81961
    Type
    Article
    Description
    An article that appeared in JASS, issue 2018
    Part of
    • 2018

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of MINDS@UWCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback