When Organizational Change Results in Symbolic Convergence: A Postmortem Case Study

File(s)
Date
2005-05Author
Palmer, Douglas J.
Publisher
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, College of Natural Resources
Metadata
Show full item recordPermanent Link
http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/81032Type
Thesis
Description
The circumstances surrounding this case study took place while the researcher was a
product development department staff member with a large, mid western, window and
door manufacturer. For purposes of anonymity and privacy, all names are fictitious
throughout the work.
The purpose of this thesis is to help gain a better understanding of organizational
change during times of new technology implementation. It is intended to shed light on
what things are helpful and what things are not, during times of major organizational
change, through advancing the utility of Symbolic convergence theory.
Today, changes in technology are occurring all around us, at an ever-increasing
rate. If organizations intend to remain viable and effectively compete in a global market
place they will need to better understand how the implementation of new technical
advancements can effect the organization at large. This research is intended to help gain
a better understanding of how an organization might better adapt when new technologies
need to be introduced. It analyzes how and why a symbolic convergence evolved during
the implementation of a new business computer system, and what positive and negative
effect attempts to control the situation may have had on the host organization.
This work is based on events that occurred in a manufacturing business
environment, in an organization that employed over one thousand people, which had
branch facilities in the eastern, southern and north-central regions of the United States.
The XYZ Corporation was growing rapidly and experiencing ownership and management
changes on a three to four year basis. As the end of the 1990s approached, top managers
needed to prepare the organization for continued expansion and growth in the new
millennium. Publicly traded, east coast based ownership was striving to align different
divisions and sister companies to maximize efficiency and profitability. A task of this
magnitude would increase the importance of a strong and well-understood vision for the
future. It would be important for a sense of unity to be in place that organization
members could understand and follow. Instead of a strong rhetorical vision for the future
taking hold and becoming a focus for support, unforeseen circumstances led to the
evolution of a symbolic convergence.
This resulted in a new business computer system being assigned a persona that no
one anticipated or could control. The persona that emerged could be identified through
the utterance of one word, and that word was Bubba. Initially a name used in playful jest,
it became a focus for unexpected shared meaning throughout an entire organization.
This study will be of interest and useful to organizations wishing to avoid pitfalls
while attempting to mold group perceptions. It will be a topic of interest to managers
because it involves a quest to gain greater understanding of what can and cannot be
controlled during times of major organizational change. In this case, time and resources
became focused on attempts to control a business computer system's name, rather than on
an understanding of why certain group perceptions and shared meanings were forming
about the system. These efforts hindered the implementation of important business goals. Attempts to manipulate the situation may have actually contributed to the growth and
strengthening of the Bubba symbolic convergence. Years after these events have taken
place, the same connotations come to mind among those who were present. This
situation evolved, even when various group members may have had little contact with
one another except through the shared experience, stories and frustrations of working
toward implementing a new computer system.