Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-08T16:34:09Z
dc.date.available2019-05-08T16:34:09Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/79082
dc.description.abstractThis thesis argued that public perception of private fallout shelters in the United States during the 1950s and early 1960s and public fallout shelters by the mid-1960s was split between different camps. Debates in newspapers revolved around three key issues: the effectiveness of the shelters given the destructiveness of nuclear fallout and thermonuclear weapons; appropriate standards regarding the marking and stocking public fallout shelters, and the concern that authorities lacked the will or adequate means to prepare the public for nuclear war. These debates extended to the federal government as well as the American public and are reflected in government studies and federal civil defense manuals as early as the Truman and Eisenhower presidencies. The benefits of private versus public shelters were closely weighed with civil defense funding and the desire to placate the fears of the public in mind. The Kennedy Administration's decision to adopt public shelters was a response to these debates and a recognition that, irrespective of funding issues, government sponsorship of shelters had become a political necessity as a form of panic control.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCold war--Social aspects--United Statesen_US
dc.subjectFallout shelters--Social aspects--United Statesen_US
dc.title"Rational Calculations by Rational Men": Public Perception of the Transition from Private to Public Atomic Fallout Shelters during the Cold War, 1961-1969en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record