Investigating the Consistency of Results Obtained from a Brief Experimental Analsysis of Oral Reading

dc.contributor.advisor	Axelrod, Michael I.
dc.contributor.author	Schounard, Christine A.
dc.contributor.author	Sutton, Maddie J.
dc.date.accessioned	2011-11-08T19:00:27Z
dc.date.available	2011-11-08T19:00:27Z
dc.date.issued	2011-05
dc.identifier.uri	http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/55008
dc.description	Color poster with text, image, and tables.	en
dc.description.abstract	Brief Experimental Analysis (BEA) has made it possible for educators to quickly select reading interventions for Oral Reading Fluency by empirically identifying treatment conditions or teaching strategies that produce the highest levels of student performance. This study compared BEA of Oral Reading Fluency results for participants from two different assessment periods conducted four months apart.	en
dc.description.sponsorship	University of Wisconsin--Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs	en
dc.language.iso	en_US	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	USGZE AS589	en
dc.subject	Oral reading--Ability testing--Evaluation	en
dc.subject	Brief experimental analysis	en
dc.subject	Response to Intervention (RtI)--Evaluation	en
dc.subject	Posters	en
dc.title	Investigating the Consistency of Results Obtained from a Brief Experimental Analsysis of Oral Reading	en
dc.type	Presentation	en