Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRivers, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorStroik, Jared
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-17T21:40:46Z
dc.date.available2010-12-17T21:40:46Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.citationVolume V, December 2010, pp.29-35.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/47696
dc.description.abstractThe Crusades began in 1095 as an effort to resist the spread of Muslim forces into Asia Minor, present-day Turkey, and to prevent Muslims from moving into Christian Europe. The Third Crusade, during the end of the twelfth century, was also known as the Kings' Crusade because the Christian forces were led by some of the most important and powerful kings of the time. One of these was Richard I, King of England. In 1191, Christian forces successfully took the city of Acre, in present-day northern Israel, after a long siege. Following the siege, however, many unarmed Muslim prisoners were killed. Some modern scholars contend that the massacre of these prisoners was ordered by Richard I as a blood-thirsty and ruthless act. This study draws on primary sources and the analysis of modern scholars to determine the validity of these claims against Richard I. Through a synthesis of primary sources, I argue that the massacre, although unfortunate, was not the act of a blood-thirsty killer, but rather a strategic last resort.en
dc.subjectCrusadesen
dc.subjectChristianity and other religionsen
dc.subjectIslam - Relations - Christianityen
dc.subjectCivilization, Medievalen
dc.subjectReligion and civilizationen
dc.titleThe Massacre at Acre--Mark of a Blood-thirsty King?en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record