• Login
    View Item 
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW Stout
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • UW-Stout Masters Thesis Collection - Plan B
    • View Item
    •   MINDS@UW Home
    • MINDS@UW Stout
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • UW-Stout Masters Thesis Collection - Plan B
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Concurrent validity of the Woodcock Johnson-Third edition Tests of Cognitive Ability and the Differential Ability Scales

    Thumbnail
    File(s)
    2000hendershottk.pdf (190.6Kb)
    Date
    2000
    Author
    Hendershott, Karen L.
    Publisher
    University of Wisconsin--Stout
    Department
    School Psychology
    Advisor(s)
    Tusing, Mary E.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Validation studies address how comparable intelligence instruments are in the cognitive abilities they assess. Results derived from validation studies are used to make inferences as to how instruments are similar and how they differ regarding the abilities they are designed to measure. The purpose of this study is to conduct a validation study between two widely used intelligence instruments. This study will compare the Woodcock Johnson-III Tests of Cognitive Ability and the Differential Ability Scales. It is expected that convergent validity will be established between similar measures of each battery, whereas it is expected that discriminant validity will be established between dissimilar abilities within each instrument.
    Permanent Link
    http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/39493
    Type
    Thesis
    Description
    Plan B
    Part of
    • UW-Stout Masters Thesis Collection - Plan B

    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of MINDS@UWCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Contact Us | Send Feedback