dc.contributor.author | Haupert, Michael J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bodenhorn, Howard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-12T17:10:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-03-12T17:10:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 27, No. 3 (August 1995) | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/38945 | |
dc.description.abstract | The article focuses on the note issue paradox of American banking in the post-Civil War era. An overview of the conundrum is given, highlighting national bank behaviors inconsistent with profit-maximizing principles and several historiographical interpretations of the behavior, namely that they did not expand note issues in beneficial conditions to do so. Additional examination is offered to free-regime state banks, noting similarities in cost and risk environments to the following national bank-regime era. Conclusions are offered suggesting unseen risk perceptions that prevented the profitable venture. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | banking, history, free banking era, national bank note paradox | en |
dc.title | Was There a Note Issue Conundrum in the Free Banking Era? | en |
dc.type | Article | en |