Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaupert, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorBodenhorn, Howard
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-12T17:10:39Z
dc.date.available2010-03-12T17:10:39Z
dc.date.issued1995-08
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 27, No. 3 (August 1995)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/38945
dc.description.abstractThe article focuses on the note issue paradox of American banking in the post-Civil War era. An overview of the conundrum is given, highlighting national bank behaviors inconsistent with profit-maximizing principles and several historiographical interpretations of the behavior, namely that they did not expand note issues in beneficial conditions to do so. Additional examination is offered to free-regime state banks, noting similarities in cost and risk environments to the following national bank-regime era. Conclusions are offered suggesting unseen risk perceptions that prevented the profitable venture.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectbanking, history, free banking era, national bank note paradoxen
dc.titleWas There a Note Issue Conundrum in the Free Banking Era?en
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record