Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoss, William
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-10T22:41:31Z
dc.date.available2009-12-10T22:41:31Z
dc.date.issued2000-07
dc.identifier.citationMediation Journal, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 1-16en
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/38211
dc.description.abstractThe present paper critiques the tendency to rely on settlement rate as the prevailing criterion measure for evaluating mediation. Instead, a multi-dimensional framework is offered, utilizing a decision tree approach. If a dispute is settled, then one set of criteria become particularly relevant. If a dispute is not settled, then a different set of criteria become relevant. Further, the evaluator must determine whether the mediator emphasized issue settlement or relationship improvement when evaluating mediation efforts that did not result in agreement.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectMediationen
dc.titleMeasuring Success in Mediationen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record