Show full item record

File(s):

Author(s)

Ross, William

Citation

Mediation Journal, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 1-16

Date

Jul 2000

Subject(s)

Mediation

Abstract

The present paper critiques the tendency to rely on settlement rate as the prevailing criterion measure for evaluating mediation. Instead, a multi-dimensional framework is offered, utilizing a decision tree approach. If a dispute is settled, then one set of criteria become particularly relevant. If a dispute is not settled, then a different set of criteria become relevant. Further, the evaluator must determine whether the mediator emphasized issue settlement or relationship improvement when evaluating mediation efforts that did not result in agreement.

Permanent link

http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/38211 

Export

Export to RefWorks 

​

Part of

UW-L Faculty Publications

Show full item record