Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStow, Robert C.
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Kyle M.
dc.contributor.authorStuewe, Katherine A.
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Corey W.
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-04T20:25:46Z
dc.date.available2009-08-04T20:25:46Z
dc.date.issued2009-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/35787
dc.descriptionColor poster with text, images, and tables (Spring 2009)en
dc.description.abstractHistorically, the standard pre-participation examination (PPE) denies 0.3% ? 1.3% of athletes, and alone may not adequately identify those individuals at-risk for injury. Kiesel, Pliskey, and Voight recently reported that a pre-season assessment of fundamental movement patterns in professional football players could predict risk of serious injury. This study tested college basketball players to address two questions: 1) are there differences between the traditional PPE and the functional movement screen (FMS) in the number of athletes cleared for participation and 2) is the pre-season FMS score associated with an increased risk of injury.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Wisconsin--Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUSGZE AS589en
dc.subjectCollege athletes--Examinationsen
dc.subjectBasketball injuries--Risk assessmenten
dc.subjectHuman mechanics--Testingen
dc.subjectPostersen
dc.titleThe Efficacy in Predicting Risk of Injury in Collegiate Basketball Players : Functional Movement Screening vs. Traditional Pre-Participation Examination.en
dc.typePresentationen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • CERCA
    Posters of collaborative student/faculty research presented at CERCA

Show simple item record