dc.contributor.advisor | Schaupp, Kristin P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dierich, Chris | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-08-03T14:57:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-03T14:57:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/35724 | |
dc.description | Color poster with text and diagrams (Spring 2009) | en |
dc.description.abstract | Philosophers have been interested in what constitutes Knowledge for centuries. The claim Knowledge=Justified True Belief can be traced back as far as Plato. With the use of a few examples Edmund Gettier showed that JTB is necessary but not sufficient for knowledge. Alvin Goldman tries to address this by requiring that
there be a causal connection between the fact that
makes something true and the person knowing it. Because inductive reasoning plays a crucial role in the formation of knowledge, we will suggest that theories with causal elements are subject to criticism. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Wisconsin--Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | USGZE AS589 | en |
dc.subject | Gettier problem | en |
dc.subject | Knowledge, Theory of | en |
dc.subject | Posters | en |
dc.title | Causal Theories of Knowledge : Why They Leave Gettier Problems Unresolved. | en |
dc.title.alternative | A Critique of the Causal Theory of Knowledge. | |
dc.type | Presentation | en |