Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalo, Dorothea
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-11T16:54:07Z
dc.date.available2007-12-11T16:54:07Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-11T16:54:07Z
dc.identifier.citationSalo, Dorothea. "Innkeeper at the Roach Motel." Library Trends 57:2 (Fall 2008).en
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/22088
dc.description.abstractLibrary-run institutional repositories face a crossroads: adapt or die. The "build it and they will come" proposition has been decisively proven wrong. Citation advantages and preservation have not attracted faculty participants, though current-generation software and services offer faculty little else. Academic librarianship has not supported repositories or their managers. Most libraries consistently under-resource and understaff repositories, further worsening the participation gap. Software and services have been wildly out of touch with faculty needs and the realities of repository management. These problems are not insoluble, especially in light of Harvard University arts and science faculty's recent permissions mandate, but they demand serious reconsideration of repository missions, goals, and means if we are to be ready for Harvard imitators, and especially to be ready should those imitators not surface.en
dc.format.extent216570 bytes
dc.format.extent254464 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsPreprint appears by gracious permission of the editors and publisher.en
dc.subjectinstitutional repositoriesen
dc.subjectopen accessen
dc.titleInnkeeper at the Roach Motelen
dc.typePreprinten


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record