<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Agriculture Reports</title>
<link href="http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/66493" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/66493</id>
<updated>2026-04-11T02:45:26Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-11T02:45:26Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Trempealeau County conservation survey report</title>
<link href="http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69635" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Janke, James</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Trechter, David</name>
</author>
<id>http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69635</id>
<updated>2019-04-24T14:10:29Z</updated>
<published>2014-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Trempealeau County conservation survey report
Janke, James; Trechter, David
The purpose of this study was to gather information and opinions about conservation issues from Trempealeau County farmland owners.
34 p.
</summary>
<dc:date>2014-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Landscape &amp; grounds maintenance short course evaluation, 2013</title>
<link href="http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69633" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Janke, James</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Trechter, David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Hadley, Shelly</name>
</author>
<id>http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69633</id>
<updated>2019-04-24T14:10:26Z</updated>
<published>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Landscape &amp; grounds maintenance short course evaluation, 2013
Janke, James; Trechter, David; Hadley, Shelly
This study was developed to evaluate the outcomes of the 2013 Landscape and Grounds Short Course sponsored by the University of Wisconsin-Extension in three southeast Wisconsin locations.&#13;
Participants in the short course sessions were asked to complete a short questionnaire to rate their knowledge on each topic before the short course and after the short course.  Answer choices were Poor, Fair, Good, and Excellent. At the end of their last session attended, registrants were given a separate questionnaire to provide overall feedback on the short course.
36 p.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Marathon County farmland preservation survey report, 2013</title>
<link href="http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69631" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Hadley, Shelly</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Janke, James</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Trechter, David</name>
</author>
<id>http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69631</id>
<updated>2019-04-24T14:10:26Z</updated>
<published>2013-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Marathon County farmland preservation survey report, 2013
Hadley, Shelly; Janke, James; Trechter, David
The purpose of this study was to gather opinions with respect to farmland preservation and agricultural issues in Marathon County.  County officials identified two populations to include in the survey: agricultural stakeholders and the general public. The questionnaires for these two populations were very similar.  The primary difference was the addition of several questions on the agriculture stakeholder version.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Eau Claire County farmland preservation survey report, 2013</title>
<link href="http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69629" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Janke, James</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Trechter, David</name>
</author>
<id>http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/69629</id>
<updated>2019-04-24T14:10:25Z</updated>
<published>2013-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Eau Claire County farmland preservation survey report, 2013
Janke, James; Trechter, David
The purpose of this study was to gather opinions with respect to farmland preservation and agricultural issues in Eau Claire County.  Eau Claire County officials identified two populations to include in the survey: agricultural stakeholders (farm operators and persons involved in businesses related to agriculture) and rural residents (households outside of the cities of Eau Claire and Altoona). The questionnaires for these two populations were very similar.  The primary difference was the addition of several questions on the agriculture stakeholder version.
42 p.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
