About This Item

Study of the difference in coverage of the Israeli operation in Gaza (December, 2008 to January, 2009) in the New York Times and BBC

Show simple item record

File(s):

Files Size Format View
Thesis for Nader Dagher ID #1672332.pdf 2.708Mb application/pdf View/Open
Key Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor Kates, James
dc.contributor.author Dagher, Nader
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-08T15:35:27Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-08T15:35:27Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.uri http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/54003
dc.description This file was last viewed in Adobe Reader 10.1.0 en
dc.description.abstract Coverage of the Middle East by western media is often an issue of argument. The most controversial is how this media cover the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While media defend itself by claiming the balanced, objective coverage, and being equally distanced from both sides, it is criticized by both the pro Palestinian and pro Israeli audiences for being sympathetic with one side or the other, like the idea of being a part of a western unfairness to the Middle Eastern conflict (Said, 1997, Fish, 2004) This study is a textual analysis of New York Times and British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) coverage of war Israel initiated in Gaza between December 27th, 2008 and January 17th, 2009. These two western media can be seen as different organizations in their structure, relation with the governments, and editorial policies. Stories published in their electronic version www.bbc.co.uk and www.nytimes.com were analyzed by applying Merrill?s (1968) model to the sources used in this coverage, and information quoted from these sources. Analysis included five categories: sources, specificity in naming these sources, and specificity in reporting casualties when reported by such sources. The analysis found differences in the use of sources between these two western media in covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but maintaining that both NYT and BBC tend to use Israeli more than Palestinian sources, with NYT heavily relying on more Israeli sources, and BBC using closer to an equal number of sources from both sides. Results of in inequality of number of sources used by media can also relate to the differences in which the Israel and the Palestinians have dealt with the media, and the availability of personnel and information on both sides, which can make an excuse for media to use sources of one side more than the other. en
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Mary Brusewitz (brusewim@mail.uww.edu) on 2011-07-29T19:34:46Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Thesis for Nader Dagher ID #1672332.pdf: 2708566 bytes, checksum: d65b1d9d151d45d979b79c1a14007476 (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Approved for entry into archive by Dianne Witte(witted@uww.edu) on 2011-08-08T15:35:27Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Thesis for Nader Dagher ID #1672332.pdf: 2708566 bytes, checksum: d65b1d9d151d45d979b79c1a14007476 (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2011-08-08T15:35:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Thesis for Nader Dagher ID #1672332.pdf: 2708566 bytes, checksum: d65b1d9d151d45d979b79c1a14007476 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.subject Gaza War, 2008-2009--Press coverage en
dc.subject Gaza Strip--Press coverage en
dc.subject Israel--Press coverage en
dc.subject Arab-Israeli conflict--Press coverage en
dc.subject Press--United States en
dc.subject Press--Great Britain en
dc.subject Broadcast journalism--Great Britain en
dc.subject Journalism--Objectivity--United States en
dc.subject Journalism--Objectivity--Great Britain en
dc.subject New York Times Company en
dc.subject British Broadcasting Corporation en
dc.title Study of the difference in coverage of the Israeli operation in Gaza (December, 2008 to January, 2009) in the New York Times and BBC en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.level MS en

Part of

Show simple item record



Advanced Search

Browse

About MINDS@UW