About This Item

Characteristics of employee-initiated complaint inspections occurring in Wisconsin

Show simple item record

File(s):

Files Size Format View
Michael Nicks' Master Degree Thesis.pdf 592.7Kb application/pdf View/Open
Key Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Hong
dc.contributor.author Nicks, Michael
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-20T20:02:01Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-20T20:02:01Z
dc.date.issued 2009-05-20T20:02:01Z
dc.identifier.uri http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/34709
dc.description Date original created: Nov. 14, 2008. This file was last viewed in Adobe Reader 8.0. en
dc.description.abstract To ensure that U.S. employers protect employees from occupational hazards, OSHA is authorized to conduct workplace inspections. Employees have the legal right to initiate an OSHA inspection predicated on occupational hazards. The study employed a survey research design utilizing data from OSHA?s IMIS. The sample consisted of 304 programmed inspections and 285 employee-initiated complaint inspections in the state of Wisconsin for the period of June 23, 2006 to June 23, 2007, inclusive. Five independent variables were examined: 1) type of inspection, 2) establishment union status, 3) establishment size, 4) type of complaint inspection, and 5) the establishment SIC code. Six dependent variables were examined: 1) mean number of violations per inspection, 2) mean monetary penalty per violation, 3) mean monetary penalty per inspection, 4) mean number of hours spent on inspection activities, 5) mean percent monetary penalty reduction, and 6) mean percent informal conference participation. It was hypothesized that there would be significant differences between each level of each independent variable with reference to each dependent variable. It was found that the mean informal conference participation percentage was significantly higher for programmed inspections (87.8%) than for employee-initiated complaint inspections (80.8%). It was found that the mean number of hours spent on inspection activities was significantly higher at unionized establishments (39.3 hours) than non-unionized establishments (29.4 hours). It was found that small establishments (less than 100 employees) had a significantly higher mean number of violations per inspection (6.5 violations) and significantly lower mean monetary penalties per violation ix ($302.53) than medium-sized establishments (between 100 and 500 employees) [2.7 violations and $578.59, respectively] and large establishments (more than 500 employees) [2.0 violations and $527.13, respectively] and that large establishments had significantly lower mean percent monetary penalty reductions (47.3%) than small establishments (34.8%). It was found that the mean number of violations per inspection was significantly higher for employee-initiated health-complaint inspections (4.8 violations) than for employee-initiated safety-complaint inspections (3.5 violations), that the mean monetary penalty per violation was significantly higher for employee-initiated safety-complaint inspections ($568.64) than for employee-initiated health-complaint inspections ($278.23), and that the mean number of hours spent on inspection activities was significantly higher for employee-initiated health-complaint inspections (37.5 hours) than for employee-initiated safety-complaint inspections (27.8 hours). It was found that manufacturing establishments had significantly lower mean percent monetary penalty reductions (35.2%) than transportation, communications, electric, gas, and sanitary services establishments (63.9%) and that retail trade establishments had significantly lower mean percent monetary penalty reductions (35.1%) than transportation, communications, electric, gas, and sanitary services establishments (63.9%). A qualitative comparison was utilized to construct possible strategies to prevent or mitigate employee-initiated complaints for the three independent variables that can easily be influenced by an employer: type of inspection, union status, and type of employee-initiated complaint inspection. en
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Mary Brusewitz (brusewim@mail.uww.edu) on 2009-05-13T18:16:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Michael Nicks' Master Degree Thesis.pdf: 592740 bytes, checksum: a2072f8cf3efae4bc24fe3aae933fd21 (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Approved for entry into archive by Dianne Witte(witted@uww.edu) on 2009-05-20T20:02:01Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Michael Nicks' Master Degree Thesis.pdf: 592740 bytes, checksum: a2072f8cf3efae4bc24fe3aae933fd21 (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2009-05-20T20:02:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Michael Nicks' Master Degree Thesis.pdf: 592740 bytes, checksum: a2072f8cf3efae4bc24fe3aae933fd21 (MD5) en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.subject United States. Occupational Safety and Health Administration--Rules and practice en
dc.subject Complaints (Administrative procedure)--Wisconsin--Evaluation en
dc.subject Labor inspection--Wisconsin en
dc.title Characteristics of employee-initiated complaint inspections occurring in Wisconsin en
dc.type Thesis en

Part of

Show simple item record



Advanced Search

Browse

About MINDS@UW